Root InsideROOT INSIDE
Research System · Internal research program

Humans set the rules.
The system grades itself.

AI agents build and run it. No statistic reaches the screen before a point-in-time backtest.

Korea KOSPI · KOSDAQUS equitiesPre-registration · self-scoringZero order APIs
Pre-registered
0
Models registered before scoring
Models racing
0
Racing live in the volatility layer
Observations
0.00M
Scored across 27 Korean symbols
Order APIs
0
No execution path exists
What we built

Three layers produce. A core synthesizes and scores.

Value-judgment layerProduces judgments about company value.Market-structure layerResponds to changes in market structure.Stock-lifecycle layerIntegrates where a stock sits in its lifecycle.Judgment coreSynthesizes three outputs → final callGrades itselfPre-registration · point-in-time backtestYoung & small-cap derivativeSame kernel · stricter charter · no growth/earnings forecasts

Conceptual diagram. Internal module names, file names and parameters are not shown.

01

Structure and discipline

We built the system as layers we call the RI series. A value-judgment layer, a market-structure layer and a stock-lifecycle layer each produce an output. A judgment core combines the three, issues the final call and grades itself. A derivative for young and small companies reuses the same kernel under a stricter charter: no growth or earnings forecasts. Every model is pre-registered before scoring, 563 so far. No statistic reaches the screen before a point-in-time backtest. Rejected hypotheses stay published beside the ones that passed. Coverage is Korea's KOSPI and KOSDAQ, and US equities.

02

The volatility layer and the working paper

In the volatility layer, ten pre-registered models race in real time. Each stamps an 80% interval forecast at 30-minute and 60-minute horizons, and a record is never edited once written. Scoring covered 27 Korean symbols and 2.95 million observations. We calibrate so that out-of-sample coverage converges to the nominal 80%. A band that is too narrow hides risk; one that is too wide is useless. The results are written up in a working paper. We do not claim to call direction. We measure the size of uncertainty and publish how well that measurement held.

03

How the AI agents are run

AI agents write the code. Humans write the rules. Agents with separate build, review and exploration roles produce code under those rules, and an agent from a different model reviews it independently. Before anything runs, automatic guards step in to block access to protected paths, leaks of secrets and dangerous commands. 227 research modules and 474 test files have accumulated this way since July 2026. We treat the operating method itself as part of the research. Deciding what an agent may do is governance.

Volatility layer

We measure the size of uncertainty, not direction.

  • Ten pre-registered models racing in real time
  • 80% interval forecasts stamped at 30- and 60-minute horizons
  • Scored on 27 Korean symbols · 2.95M observations
  • Calibrated so out-of-sample coverage converges to nominal 80%
  • Written up as a working paper
80% interval band · synthetic data demo
obs 0inside —%target 80%

This chart is a synthetic random path generated in your browser. It is not market data and not output of the production system; it only illustrates what a band means. Gold dots mark observations outside the band.

What we don't do

We state the limits first.

×

Firewall

Zero order or account APIs. No trading desk, no client money. The system is a decision-support tool, not an execution tool.

×

No direction claims

We do not claim an edge in predicting direction. Our own accuracy review names it the weakest axis, and we say so.

×

No advice

We do not recommend buying or selling any security. Output is for research and education.

×

No managed money

We hold no client assets and never trade on anyone's behalf from the system's output.

◆Honesty principle: in the system's own accuracy review, the weakest axis is direction. The strong axes are uncertainty measurement (volatility bands) and enforced discipline (pre-registration, self-scoring). We do not state them in any other order.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

We claim no edge in predicting direction. In the system's own accuracy review, direction is the weakest axis, and we do not hide that. The strong axes are uncertainty measurement and enforced discipline. Every model is pre-registered before scoring, and rejected hypotheses stay published next to the ones that passed.

It is an internal research program of Root Inside Co., Ltd. People set the rules; AI agents with separate build, review and exploration roles write the code under them. Review is done independently by an agent from a different model. Automatic guards block protected paths, secret leaks and dangerous commands before execution. We do not name individuals.

No. There are zero order or account APIs and no trading desk. We hold no client money. The system is a decision-support tool, not an execution tool. Its output is for research and education and does not recommend buying or selling any security.

NoticeDescriptions of the research system on this site introduce an internal research program of Root Inside Co., Ltd. and are provided for research and educational purposes only. They are not a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument and do not substitute for your own judgment. All investment decisions, and their outcomes, are the sole responsibility of the user.